Authors: Hassan Awas Saad, Ahmed M Yehia, Gamal Osman.
Background: The goal of our work-study was to detect the net result and potency of of PRP local jnj. Dressings compared to PRP in jel to the wound for DFU healing compared to a control therapy of traditional classic dressing (PRP) also to decrease the recurrence (DFUs). Diabetic foot is a more famous and face any surgeon in his clinic or hospital. It has a new promise therapy of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU), with cellular and tissue regeneration, because of several methods in wound care management. All hope to attain good healing and hope to decrease recurrent rate.
Patients and Methods: Forty-five patients with DFU were matched and grouped for (PRP) local injection dressings (n = 15), PRP jel to wound edges (n = 15), or classic dressing (n = 15) from August 2019 to March 2021. There were additional complications and ulcer recurrences were detected Ulcer or raw area healing and reduction were the primary objectives at 1; 3, 6, and 12 months. The study comprised 36 (80.0%) males and 9 (20.0%) females between the ages of 30 and 65 who had DFU for 1 to 10 years.
Results: Local PRP injections improved healing 12/15 (80%) greater than local PRP jel dressings 10/15 (66.7%) and classic dressings 7/15(46.7%). However, PRP wound injection increase the healing of diabetic ulcers raw area more than PRP local jel or traditional classic dressing the healing period following local PRP injection was much shorter. At all follow-up visits, the in all the groups had similar rates of recurrence and complications. All of them had similar recurrence and variant safety.
Conclusions: PRP injection is a more potent technique for treating DFU than local PRP jel administration and classic wound dressings, with slight the same recurrence. Less Amputation rates, infection rates, and discharges are all reduced with PRP injection than PRP jel than classic treatment.
View/Download pdf