Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & Reviews

Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & Reviews

Open Access
ISSN: 2639-944X
Research Article

Open Prostatectomy vs. Laparoscopic Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Large Volume Prostate: A Meta-analysis

Authors: Chen H, Huang MP, Huang TH, Yang XY, Liu QL, Li QQ, Xie KJ, Jiang CH

DOI: 10.33425/2639-944X.1032


Abstract

Objective: To compare laparoscopic prostatectomy with Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large volume (>80ml).

Methods: The literature was identified systematically using Medline, Embase. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.0.

Results: 3 CCTs were included. There was no difference between LP and OP in terms of IPSS, Qmax. LP was associated with significantly less blood loss, a shorter irrigation, catheterization and hospital stay time except longer operating time. LP and OP were similar in terms of urethral stricture, incontinence, transfusion requirement and rate of reintervention.

Conclusion: LP served a significant improvement in IPSS, Qmax as well as OP. Although more operating time and less resected tissue, LP has several advantages over OP. It was as safe as OP in terms of adverse events.

View / Download PDF
Citation: Chen H, Huang MP, Huang TH, et al. Open Prostatectomy vs. Laparoscopic Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Large Volume Prostate: A Meta-analysis. 2018; 2(1). DOI: 10.33425/2639-944X.1032
Editor-in-Chief
Sara Badia
Sara Badia
Cardiac Surgery Department | Germans Trias University Hospital in Pujol

View full editorial board →
Journal Metrics
Impact Factor 1.84
Acceptance Rate 90%
Time to first decision 6-10 Days
Submission to acceptance 12-15 Days