Neurology - Research & Surgery
Open AccessNeurological Disorders, Bone Setters and Pain: Clinical Observation and the Appraisal of Its Treatments in Two Modern Hospitals and Various Non Medical Settings in Ghana
Authors: Desmond Ayim-Aboagye, Isaac Opoku Afrifa.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Major neurological disorders and orthopedic problems that patients suffer in Ghana are numerous. The study discusses their various treatment centers in the hospital sector and in the local domain, as well as their traditional medical practitioners. The non-medical treatment centers in the Eastern Region of Ghana have been visited, and their dynamic contributions to patients’ pain treatment, both acute and chronic, have been accounted for.Method: This study investigates neurological disorders, bone setters, and pain treatment by using clinical interviews and naturalistic observation. This six-month research illuminates the appraisal of its treatments in two modern hospitals in the Begoro Fanteakwa District and some non-medical settings in Ghana.Results: The results show that both biomedical practitioners (PBD) and non-medical practitioners (KTP) collaborate, intentionally or unintentionally, to provide effective treatments for neurological disorders and pain. This collaboration benefits patients who often receive care from both sectors. Indigenous medical practitioners’ efficacy about pain treatment depends on their experience, methods, and cultural beliefs shared with the patients. Cultural myths reinforce certain treatment approaches. The study finds that, despite differences in treatment practices, both medical and non-medical centers play important roles in Ghana’s healthcare landscape.Conclusion: The study finds that hospitals often resort to amputation when treating severe pain from accidents or injuries, while traditional practitioners generally aim to avoid amputation. This creates a clear distinction between hospital and traditional treatment approaches for pain. Patients tend to seek traditional practitioners first, turning to hospitals only when other options are unavailable. The presence of both sectors enables patients to compare and choose where they perceive the best chance of recovery and quality of life.
View / Download PDFEditor-in-Chief
View full editorial board →