Between 1990 and 1996 a loose confederation of poets, analysts, and storytellers — Robert Bly, James Hillman, Martín Prechtel, and Michael Meade — conducted large residential gatherings in North America and Britain that proposed initiation, imagination, grief, and myth as remedies for a culture they judged to be soul-starved.

This essay is a retrospective assessment of that movement by a neurologist who attended one such gathering in Sussex in 1993–94 and who has spent the three decades since developing a hermeneutic and kabbalistic account of the clinical encounter. I argue that the mythopoetic teachers correctly diagnosed the symptom — the collapse of initiatory structure, the flattening of imagination, the privatization of grief — but lacked an adequate ontology of absence and therefore could not finally distinguish a descent that heals from a descent that merely repeats.

Lurianic Kabbalah supplies that ontology through tzimtzum, shevirat ha-kelim, and tikkun; twelve-step recovery supplies the accountability structure that the men's movement conspicuously lacked.

Read through those two correctives, the four teachers remain clinically indispensable: Hillman's injunction to stay with the image underwrites sacred listening; Bly's initiatory grammar illuminates the patient's passage through diagnosis; Prechtel's economy of grief and praise names what caregiver burnout actually is; Meade's civic mythology explains why healthcare institutions reproduce their own pathologies. I close with a critical accounting of what in the movement should not be recovered, and with the parallel between Hillman's archetypal psychology and Elliot Wolfson's phenomenology of kabbalistic symbolism.